Change Happens at the Speed of Trust
Katherine Yngve was interviewed in November 2023. She emphasizes that when seeking to practice equity-centered assessment, she “lead[s] with inclusion and equity; not measurement. It brings more people together to build relationships of trust.”
Ms. Yngve described the following lessons she learned related to her ten years of working to build inclusion capacity at a research-one PWI:
1. Shame is an ineffective pedagogical tool. You cannot shame people into being more equitable or caring about equity.
2. Building large networks of folks who do this work (at conferences and through reading their work) can help to support the work that you are doing and help you adjust that work to your unique environment (politically, demographically, etc.). Spending time on building relationships and coalitions is crucial.
3. It is wise to tie equity activities to institutional priorities. While [your institution] may seem not be fully invested in inclusion, they are fully invested in retaining and graduating all students.
4. It is important to not only showcase the work you are doing [to those] outside of your institution, you should showcase internally as well. There may be folks internally who are interested in supporting, amplifying or replicating the work you are doing. Internal sharing can (and should) also create a space for faculty or staff interested in this work to get campus-level recognition for their support, leadership and time.
5. Smart equity-centered assessment champions will find a way to infuse assessment with equity while not adding an additional strain on faculty or supporting staff. This feat requires sound project alignment and project management."
Holly, J., & Masta, S. (2021). Making whiteness visible: The promise of critical race theory in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, Volume 10, Issue 4. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/170821/jee20432.pdf?sequence=2